Radioactive decay dating video
the age of the earth and the universe, and that includes the ones we have listed here.Although age indicators are called ‘clocks’ they aren’t, because all ages result from calculations that necessarily involve making assumptions about the past.Such is the nature of science, especially historical science, because we cannot do experiments on past events (see “It’s not science”).Science is based on observation, and the only reliable means of telling the age of anything is by the testimony of a reliable witness who observed the events. Thank you guys for putting so much work into this site! Regarding Göbekli Tepe, always check using the search engine.
Sooner or later that supposed evidence will be turned on its head and will even be added to this list of evidences for a young age of the earth.However, the 4th reference of that article, the one you claim proves that DNA cannot last for millions of years never makes this claim.It only speaks of ways in which DNA is damaged in living cells - (which fossils are clearly not).However, to draw this conclusion we have to assume that the rate of cratering has been the same in the past as it is now.And there are now good reasons for thinking that it might have been quite intense in the past, in which case the craters do not indicate an old age at all (see below).